Why listen to this group's fawning and syncophantic rants about their mother ship's cosmic handling of regional transportation, it's clear for everyone to see what Sound Transit hasn't done. They've been an arrogant crowd of punks who steamroller over anyone that doesn't agree with them. Theyre misogynists to the man and think that they're entitled to dominate the transit world because they believe themselves to be so smart and they are so much better informed than the rest of us. They've given so much in-kind support to sound transit that they should be racked up for not filing PDC reports and they also should be reported to the IRS for their phony 501C3 registration. Let's face it they're the off the books lobbyist for sound transit. Doing their little condescension and we know better than you do act. Something else I'm just about 100% certain of.Īhhh, The snotty boys from Seattle subway. Looking forward to your handle disappearing from this comments section come November 9. And something tells me that it's that very certainty that is the real thing that bothers you so much.
#SHIPIT NOTTHGATE FULL#
You know full well that if Proposition 1 passes then we're going to be getting grade-separated light rail from downtown to Ballard. It's that you're not as stupid as you make yourself out to be. Heck, there wouldn't even be a United States of America.īut here's one thing I am just about 100% certain of.
If I have a child, there's no 100% concrete guarantee from The Good Lord Above that my child won't suffer some horrible fate before 18, and next thing I'm opening up "When Bad Things Happen to Good People." If Americans had applied your standard of certainty, we wouldn't have fought the Civil War or built the Transcontinental Railroad. God, I just love all these folks like johnyaya who suddenly sign up to comment on Slog when a mass transit initiative rolls around and always have to couch their anti-transit rhetoric with "While I am pro-transit for the most part."īut there's a special level of stupidity (or an expectation of gullibility) with this particular comment "Concrete, penned-in guarantees of positive outcomes to a 'yes' vote on Proposition 1" sounds more like an abstract philosophical argument. Point out which clause ensures the federal government *will* give ST3 a windfall of money. Point out exactly which clause guarantees faster delivery of each project. If you don't agree, I invite you to site your sources specifically within Proposition 1's language and/or ST3's documentation - since that is what we're voting on and what we're getting locked into for multiple decades. Please stop trying to sell it as fact when it clearly is not. Equally, other positive possibilities *may* exist on a negative vote against ST3.Īt the end of the day, neither Seattle Subway nor anyone else can predict the future whether the outcome of the Proposition 1 vote is affirmative nor negative.
While I agree some positive possibilities *may* exist, the documentation for ST3 and Proposition 1 by no means makes them actual facts. You use words such as 'sometimes' and 'possibilities' and 'if' as if these were concrete, penned-in guarantees of positive outcomes to a 'yes' vote on Proposition 1.
While I am pro-transit for the most part, this article is attempting to persuade a 'yes' vote while not providing substantial evidence for such support.
0 kommentar(er)
